Gatsby vs. Textpattern: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Powerful Content Management Systems

Gatsby vs. Textpattern: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Powerful Content Management Systems


Choosing a content management system (CMS) is a critical decision for any organization, as it sets the foundation for managing and publishing content on your website. Gatsby and Textpattern are two popular CMS options, each with their strengths and weaknesses. In this comparison guide, we'll dive into the key features, advantages, and trade-offs of Gatsby and Textpattern, helping digital leaders and decision-makers understand which CMS is the right fit for their organization.

Foundations of CMS

Gatsby and Textpattern have different foundations when it comes to content management. Gatsby is based on a modern web development stack that leverages React, GraphQL, and static site generation to deliver fast, performant websites. It offers a developer-centric approach, allowing you to build websites using components, templates, and APIs. On the other hand, Textpattern is a simpler CMS that focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and traditional content management. It provides a WYSIWYG editing experience and supports a wide range of content types, making it ideal for content creators who are not necessarily developers.

Gatsby's strength lies in its ability to deliver highly optimized websites that load quickly and provide exceptional user experiences. It achieves this by pre-rendering pages at build time and serving them as static assets from a content delivery network (CDN). In contrast, Textpattern's focus on simplicity makes it an intuitive choice for those who prefer a straightforward editor and a streamlined content creation process. However, it may not offer the same level of performance optimization as Gatsby.

When deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern, consider the needs of your organization. If you require advanced performance optimization and have a team of developers or technical resources, Gatsby may be the better option. If simplicity and ease of use are more important, Textpattern may be a suitable choice.

Design & User Experience

The design and user experience of a CMS play a crucial role in how efficiently you can manage and present your content. Gatsby provides a wide range of design options through its extensive ecosystem of themes and plugins. It enables you to create visually stunning websites with flexible layouts and responsive designs. Gatsby's integration with React allows you to leverage the power of reusable components, resulting in consistent and modular designs.

In contrast, Textpattern focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for content creators to manage and publish their content. While it may not have the same level of design flexibility as Gatsby, Textpattern provides a user-friendly experience that requires minimal technical knowledge.

Consider your organization's design requirements and resources when deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern. If you have a design team or developers who can create custom designs and templates, Gatsby offers more flexibility. If you need a straightforward and user-friendly interface for content creators without extensive design needs, Textpattern may be the preferred choice.

It's worth noting that both Gatsby and Textpattern support responsive design, allowing you to create websites that adapt seamlessly to different screen sizes and devices.

Content Management

Efficiently managing and organizing content is the core function of any CMS. Gatsby and Textpattern take different approaches to content management. Gatsby treats content as data stored in separate files, typically written in Markdown or JSON format. This separation of content from the underlying code makes it easier to manage and version content. You can use a headless CMS, such as Contentful or Strapi, to store and manage content for your Gatsby site.

Textpattern, on the other hand, provides an all-in-one content management solution. It has a built-in database and a straightforward content creation interface. You can create and organize content using Textpattern's user-friendly editor and categorization system. Textpattern allows you to define custom fields and templates, providing flexibility in content organization and structure.

Choosing between Gatsby and Textpattern depends on your organization's content management needs. If you prefer a more decoupled and flexible approach, where content can be managed independently from the CMS, Gatsby's content-as-data approach may be suitable. On the other hand, if you need an all-in-one solution with a simple content creation interface, Textpattern offers a seamless content management experience.

Consider the complexity of your content, the size of your content team, and the need for granular control over content structure when making your decision.

Collaboration & User Management

Effective collaboration and user management are essential for organizations with multiple content creators and editors. Both Gatsby and Textpattern provide features to facilitate collaboration and user management.

Gatsby, being a developer-centric CMS, is designed to integrate with popular version control systems like Git. This allows teams to collaborate on content creation, review, and approval processes, leveraging the power of version control. Gatsby also supports user authentication and role-based access control, ensuring that only authorized users can access and modify content.

Textpattern offers a user-friendly interface for managing user accounts and permissions. Administrators can create different user roles and assign permissions accordingly. This allows organizations to define different levels of access and responsibilities for content creators, editors, and administrators. Textpattern also provides a file-based backup system, ensuring that content data is securely stored and can be easily restored if needed.

Consider the size and structure of your content team, as well as the need for version control and granular user permissions when deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern.

Performance, Scalability, & Hosting

Website performance, scalability, and hosting options are critical factors to consider when selecting a CMS. Gatsby offers exceptional performance by generating static HTML files at build time. This enables fast-loading websites that can be served from a content delivery network (CDN). Gatsby sites can handle high traffic loads and provide excellent user experiences.

Textpattern, being a traditional CMS, generates dynamic web pages on the server. While it may not offer the same level of performance optimization as Gatsby, Textpattern is a solid choice for smaller-scale websites with moderate traffic.

In terms of hosting options, Gatsby sites can be hosted on various platforms, including popular static site hosting services like Netlify and Vercel. Gatsby also integrates well with cloud hosting providers, allowing you to leverage their scalability and infrastructure-as-code capabilities.

Textpattern can be hosted on various web hosting providers that support PHP and MySQL. It is compatible with most shared hosting environments, making it accessible for organizations with budget constraints or limited technical resources.

Consider the expected traffic and performance requirements of your website, as well as your hosting preferences, when deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern.

Customization, Extensions, & Ecosystem

The ability to customize and extend your CMS plays a significant role in meeting your organization's unique needs. Gatsby offers a vast ecosystem of plugins and themes that allow you to extend its core functionality. You can find plugins for SEO optimization, data sourcing, image optimization, and more. Gatsby's integration with JavaScript libraries and frameworks gives you the flexibility to build custom functionalities.

Textpattern also provides a range of customization options. You can create custom templates, stylesheets, and snippets to control the look and feel of your website. Textpattern's plugin ecosystem offers additional features and functionalities, allowing you to extend its core capabilities. However, compared to Gatsby, Textpattern's customization options may be more limited due to its focus on simplicity.

Consider the specific customization needs of your organization and the availability of plugins, themes, and developer resources when considering Gatsby or Textpattern.

SEO, Marketing, & Monetization

Search engine optimization (SEO), marketing, and monetization capabilities are critical for organizations that rely on their websites for generating traffic, leads, and revenue. Gatsby provides excellent out-of-the-box SEO optimization, thanks to its static site generation and performance optimization features. It generates clean HTML markup and allows you to customize meta tags, headers, and other SEO elements. Gatsby also integrates well with popular SEO tools and services.

Textpattern offers basic SEO features, such as customizable URLs and meta tags. While it may not have the same level of SEO optimization as Gatsby, Textpattern provides a solid foundation for managing on-page SEO elements.

In terms of marketing and monetization, both Gatsby and Textpattern allow you to integrate with third-party tools and services. Gatsby's rich ecosystem of plugins includes various marketing and analytics integrations, making it a powerful choice for organizations with sophisticated marketing strategies. Textpattern also allows integration with marketing automation and analytics tools through its plugin system.

Consider the importance of SEO, marketing needs, and the availability of integrations with third-party tools when deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern.

Security & Compliance

Ensuring the security and compliance of your website and content is crucial for organizations handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries. Both Gatsby and Textpattern offer various security features and follow best practices.

Gatsby's static site generation approach provides inherent security benefits. Since it serves static files, it reduces the attack surface and lowers the risk of vulnerabilities. Gatsby also provides security headers by default and supports HTTPS for secure communication. However, it's crucial to ensure the security of any external data sources or APIs you integrate with your Gatsby site.

Textpattern follows web security best practices and prioritizes the security of its codebase. It provides options for secure user authentication and includes features like IP blocking and CAPTCHA support to mitigate risks. As with any CMS, it's essential to keep the Textpattern software up to date and maintain regular backups for security and disaster recovery purposes.

Consider your organization's specific security requirements and compliance obligations when evaluating the security aspects of Gatsby and Textpattern.

Migration, Support, & Maintenance

The ease of migration, availability of support, and ongoing maintenance requirements are essential considerations when choosing a CMS.

Both Gatsby and Textpattern provide resources and documentation to assist with migration from other CMS platforms. Gatsby's extensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums make it relatively straightforward to migrate and onboard. Gatsby's strong developer community and ecosystem also ensure ongoing support and availability of resources.

Textpattern offers migration options for certain CMS platforms, but they may require more technical expertise compared to Gatsby. However, once migrated, Textpattern's user-friendly interface makes day-to-day management and maintenance relatively simple. Textpattern has an active support community, and their website provides guides and forums to assist with troubleshooting and maintaining your Textpattern installation.

Consider the availability of migration tools, the level of technical expertise within your organization, and the ongoing support and maintenance requirements when choosing between Gatsby and Textpattern.


Gatsby and Textpattern are both capable CMS options, each with their own advantages and trade-offs. Gatsby excels in performance, scalability, and customization options, making it a powerful choice for organizations with technical resources and the need for high-performance websites. On the other hand, Textpattern focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and content management features, catering to content creators who prioritize a user-friendly experience.

When deciding between Gatsby and Textpattern, consider factors such as your organization's technical resources, content management needs, design requirements, and scalability requirements. Evaluate how each CMS aligns with your specific goals and the unique challenges your organization faces. By carefully considering these aspects, you can make an informed decision and choose the CMS that best suits your organization's needs.


Martin Dejnicki
Martin Dejnicki

Martin is a digital product innovator and pioneer who built and optimized his first website back in 1996 when he was 16 years old. Since then, he has helped many companies win in the digital space, including Walmart, IBM, Rogers, Canada Post, TMX Group and TD Securities. Recently, he worked with the Deploi team to build an elegant publishing platform for creative writers and a novel algorithmic trading platform.