Microweber vs. Movable Type: A Comprehensive CMS Comparison Guide

Microweber vs. Movable Type: A Comprehensive CMS Comparison Guide


Welcome to our comprehensive comparison guide of Microweber and Movable Type, two popular Content Management Systems (CMS). As digital leaders and decision-makers, it's crucial to choose the right CMS for your organization. In this guide, we will analyze and compare the features, capabilities, and strengths of Microweber and Movable Type, helping you make an informed choice.

Foundations of CMS

Microweber and Movable Type are both powerful CMS platforms, but they have different foundations. Microweber is an open-source CMS written in PHP, built on the Laravel framework. It offers a user-friendly interface and provides drag-and-drop functionality, making it easy for non-technical users to create and manage websites. On the other hand, Movable Type is a proprietary CMS written in Perl. It has a long-standing history in the industry and has gained popularity for its scalability and flexibility.

In terms of ease of use, Microweber excels with its intuitive visual editor, which allows users to see real-time changes while editing content. It also offers a wide range of pre-designed templates and themes for quick website creation. Movable Type, although it requires more technical knowledge to set up, offers greater customization options and flexibility in terms of design and layouts.

Both Microweber and Movable Type provide multi-language support and offer a dedicated community for support and guidance. Consider your organization's technical expertise and design requirements when choosing between the two.

Verdict: Microweber may be a better choice for non-technical users seeking a user-friendly CMS, while Movable Type offers more flexibility and customization options for organizations with technical expertise.

Design & User Experience

When it comes to design and user experience, Microweber and Movable Type offer different approaches. Microweber focuses on providing ready-made templates and themes that can be easily customized using the drag-and-drop functionality. It offers a wide variety of design options, ranging from simple business websites to complex e-commerce stores.

Movable Type, on the other hand, takes a more hands-on approach to design. It allows users to create and customize templates using its built-in template tags and the powerful Template Toolkit. This level of customization provides greater control over the design and layout of the website, making it suitable for organizations with specific design requirements.

In terms of user experience, Microweber's visual editor simplifies content creation and editing, allowing non-technical users to make changes easily. It also offers a responsive design, ensuring that your website looks great on all devices. Movable Type provides a more hands-on experience, where users have more control over every aspect of their website's design and functionality.

Verdict: Microweber is a great choice for users who prioritize ease of use and want a hassle-free design experience. Movable Type is a better option for those who value customization and have specific design requirements.

Content Management

Content management is at the core of any CMS, and both Microweber and Movable Type offer robust features in this area. Microweber provides a visual editor that allows users to create, edit, and manage content using a drag-and-drop interface. It supports various content types, including articles, blog posts, images, videos, and more. With Microweber, you can easily organize your content using categories, tags, and custom fields.

Movable Type offers a flexible content management system that allows users to create and manage content using customizable templates and dynamic publishing. It offers built-in content versioning, making it easier to track and manage content changes over time. Movable Type also provides a user-friendly editor with support for multimedia elements, making it easy to create engaging and interactive content.

Both Microweber and Movable Type offer SEO-friendly features such as customizable URLs, meta-tags, and sitemaps. They also provide robust media management capabilities, making it easy to upload, organize, and optimize images and videos.

Verdict: Microweber offers an intuitive and user-friendly content management system, ideal for non-technical users. Movable Type provides greater flexibility and control over content creation and customization, making it suitable for organizations with more advanced content management needs.

Collaboration & User Management

Collaboration and user management are essential features for organizations with multiple team members involved in content creation and publishing. Microweber supports multi-user collaboration by allowing you to set up user roles and permissions. You can define different access levels for users, ensuring that each team member has the right level of control and responsibility.

Movable Type also offers robust collaboration features, enabling user management and assignment of roles. It provides granular permissions and allows you to manage user groups, making it easier to control access to specific content and functionalities. Movable Type also offers a workflow management system that allows users to create and follow editorial workflows.

Both Microweber and Movable Type provide version control, allowing users to revert to previous versions of content. This feature is particularly useful when multiple team members are working on the same content or when changes need to be rolled back.

Verdict: Microweber and Movable Type both offer strong collaboration and user management features. Consider your organization's specific needs, such as the number of team members, the complexity of workflows, and the level of control required, to make an informed decision.

Performance, Scalability, & Hosting

Performance, scalability, and hosting are critical factors to consider when choosing a CMS for your organization. Microweber offers a fast and lightweight platform that ensures quick page load times and smooth user experience. It supports caching, enabling faster content delivery, and provides options to optimize images and code for improved performance.

Movable Type is known for its scalability and is often preferred by larger organizations with high-traffic websites. It can handle large volumes of content and can be seamlessly integrated with caching and load balancing solutions to ensure optimal performance. Movable Type also provides support for multiple web servers and database configurations, allowing for efficient distribution of resources.

In terms of hosting, Microweber offers cloud hosting options, making it easy to deploy and manage your website. It also supports self-hosting, giving you full control over the hosting environment. Movable Type can be hosted on various platforms, including cloud-based solutions and on-premises servers.

Verdict: Microweber is a solid choice for organizations of all sizes, offering fast performance and flexible hosting options. Movable Type is recommended for large-scale websites with high traffic volumes that require scalability and robust hosting capabilities.

Customization, Extensions, & Ecosystem

Customization and extensibility are crucial considerations when selecting a CMS. Microweber provides a range of pre-designed templates and themes that can be easily customized to match your brand. It also offers a marketplace where you can find additional modules, widgets, and extensions to enhance the functionality of your website.

Movable Type provides greater customization options, allowing users to create and modify templates using its built-in template language. It also offers a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be integrated into your website to add new features and functionality.

Both Microweber and Movable Type have dedicated communities of developers and designers who contribute to the ecosystem. They provide support, documentation, and tutorials, helping users make the most of the available customization options and extensions.

Verdict: Microweber is recommended for users seeking a balance between ease of use and customization options. Movable Type is a better fit for organizations that require a high level of customization and have specific functionality requirements.

SEO, Marketing, & Monetization

SEO, marketing, and monetization are essential aspects of any successful website. Microweber offers built-in SEO features, including customizable URLs, meta-tags, and sitemap generation. It also integrates with popular marketing tools such as Google Analytics and provides options for social media sharing and integration.

Movable Type provides similar SEO features and offers plugins for additional optimization capabilities. It also supports various advertising and monetization options, allowing you to generate revenue from your website through ads or subscriptions.

Both Microweber and Movable Type offer integrations with popular email marketing platforms, enabling you to build and manage mailing lists effectively.

Verdict: Microweber and Movable Type provide robust SEO and marketing features. Choose Microweber if you prioritize ease of use and straightforward marketing integration. Movable Type is suitable for organizations seeking advanced monetization options.

Security & Compliance

Security and compliance are critical considerations when choosing a CMS. Microweber focuses on security and offers features such as secure logins, user authentication, and data encryption. It follows best practices in terms of code security and regularly releases updates and patches to address vulnerabilities.

Movable Type also prioritizes security and provides features to protect your website from malicious attacks. It offers user permissions and access controls to ensure that sensitive data is only accessible to authorized individuals. Movable Type also follows compliance standards, including GDPR, ensuring that your website meets legal requirements.

Verdict: Both Microweber and Movable Type prioritize security and compliance. Consider your specific security requirements and compliance obligations to make the best choice for your organization.

Migration, Support, & Maintenance

Migration, support, and maintenance are essential factors to consider when choosing a CMS. Microweber offers a straightforward migration process, allowing you to import content from other CMS platforms easily. It provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a dedicated support forum to help users get started and troubleshoot any issues.

Movable Type offers migration tools and services to ensure a smooth transition from other CMS platforms. It provides support through its community forums and offers paid support packages for organizations requiring additional assistance. Movable Type also provides regular updates and patches, ensuring that your website remains secure and up to date.

Verdict: Microweber and Movable Type both provide migration tools and support resources. Consider the level of support needed and migration requirements of your organization to make an informed decision.


In conclusion, both Microweber and Movable Type are powerful CMS platforms with their own strengths and weaknesses. Microweber excels in ease of use, design simplicity, and user-friendly content management. Movable Type offers greater customization options, scalability, and flexibility. Consider the specific needs of your organization, such as technical expertise, design requirements, collaboration needs, and scalability requirements, to choose the CMS that best fits your organization's goals and objectives.


Martin Dejnicki
Martin Dejnicki

Martin is a digital product innovator and pioneer who built and optimized his first website back in 1996 when he was 16 years old. Since then, he has helped many companies win in the digital space, including Walmart, IBM, Rogers, Canada Post, TMX Group and TD Securities. Recently, he worked with the Deploi team to build an elegant publishing platform for creative writers and a novel algorithmic trading platform.